Anything on your mind that isn't about RLS? It's nice to realize that there is life beyond this disease and have an opportunity to get to know our online family in a different context.
Sorry, KBear, I just got that link quickly the other day and guess I didn't pay close enough attention.
Anyway, glad to do my bit for all of us. It's the least I can do. I hope, some day, we never have to worry about writing a letter like that. Wouldn't that be wonderful?
Hmmm, I just received a letter from Consumer Reports begging me to renew my membership, since I let it lapse a while ago. Instead of a renewal form, they're going to get a copy of my letter.
Go to the starts of their text reply, and click /hold down your left mouse button and drag your mouse down over the entire reply.. The screen should scroll with it, if necesarry (but sometimes programs don't...so maybe not).
Then you should be able to right click on the highlighted text, and select "copy" or "cut" and be able to "paste" it into a forum post..
You can also try CTRL+A to highlight the entire document window, but you will likely have to trim off all the extra text you don't want when you paste it here
Thank you for contacting us to share your feelings regarding the Consumer
Reports AdWatch video on Requip. We take the comments that we receive
quite seriously as we allow them to shape all of the work that we do.
First, while we appreciate the points you make, we believe that the video
clearly does not make light of RLS or at anyone who suffers from the
problem. As the video and accompanying introduction both note, RLS is a
real condition that afflicts some 3% of Americans. We have great sympathy
for all who suffer from this syndrome and other chronic diseases, and agree
that many people get relief from prescription drugs.
The point of the video has to do instead with the marketing of this
product, and of the disease. We feel, and say in the video, that the ad's
description of RLS is so vague that almost anyone might come away wondering
whether they have it. We feel that the dr ug's side effects include some
that can in fact be troubling. And we try to point out how the ad, in our
opinion, manages to downplay these problems through the use of a gentle
soundtrack and relaxing imagery while listing them.
We also feel that by focusing solely on a pharmaceutical remedy, the ad
overlooks various non-medicinal treatments that are probably worth
considering in evaluating a proper therapy.
All of the above are important points, and we think they come through
plainly to viewers - an impression that is backed up by the many favorable
comments about the video that have appeared on our weblog and on others
that follow this industry.
We don't hope to change your mind about this point, but we do want to make
clear that projects like AdWatch are part of the mission of an independent,
non-ad-supported, consumer organization like Consumers Union, the publisher
of Consumer Reports. Direct-to-consumer (DTC) drug ads have become
increasingly common on TV, in magazines and newspapers, and on the Web. It
is the responsibility of groups like Consumers Union to provide
counter-perspective where we believe it could be valuable, and this is one
of those instances.
Thanks again for taking the time to write. Your interest in our work is
greatly appreciated.